Quantcast
Channel: AgendaWise Reports RSS Blog Feed
Viewing all 272 articles
Browse latest View live

New conservative imposter group: TFBA

$
0
0

Texas Future Business Alliance is a newly formed a 501c(4) to help Texans identify lawmakers in lockstep with the lobby. Of course, that is not the group's stated goal but their efforts will accomplish it just the same.

The new entity is founded by some of the largest lobby/association outfits in Texas. As predictably as a jack-in-the-box, the group is billing itself as ‘grassroots’.

One of the group’s first activities was to help liberal Republican Sarah Davis, who failed taxpayers this session according to Empower Texans Fiscal Responsibility Index and the Young Conservatives of Texans rankings. Rice political science professor Mark Jones places Davis in the most liberal sector of the Republican Party.

Davis, resembling her big sis Abortion Barbie (no relation), has the distinction of being the only openly pro-abortion Republican elected to either of the state's legislative bodies. Her performance in all conservative sectors is equally bad.

TFBA counts as its founding members the Associated General Contractors, Texans for Lawsuit Reform, Texas Hospital Association, Texas Medical Association, Texas Association of Builders and the Texas Association of Realtors.

Last week we noted that the Texas Association of Realtors was backing a Democrat candidate with a history of supporting creation of a state income tax.

Earlier this week we noted the track record of giving by TLR. Involvement in this group is more evidence of the group’s position against conservatives and for the lobby.


Analysis: Team Staples gives mostly to liberals

$
0
0

Todd Staples needs to convince GOP primary voters he’s conservative, and his recently announced finance team won't help.

Members of the Staples finance team have supported lawmakers in the past. During the 2013 legislative session lawmakers receiving money from Staples’ finance team - some Democrat and some Republican - scored an average of 55% on conservative scorecards. The Republicans they gave to averaged an anemic 66%.

ScoreAmount% of totalLawmakers
A$3600011.0235690029488%6
B$3800011.6359895031126%6
C$9834830.1151656750558%16
D$4000012.2484100032764%7
F$11422534.9768658156063%35

Self-proclaimed Obama voter Paul Burka and Bob Garrett were media members who played up Staples’ finance team announcement as impressive. It’s hard to figure why, since the finance team are far from high-rollers. A review of Texas Ethics Commission filings reveals that during 2012 Staples finance team members giving to elected members of the Texas House and Senate totaled less than $350,000. Perhaps Burka and Garrett were giving an obligatory carrot to the Lt. Gov. Candidate they view as most liberal.

Current consensus has David Dewhurst and Dan Patrick far ahead of the field vying to become the next Lt. Governor of Texas.

Paul Burka on Staples money men
DMN article

*Names used to compile this list were obtained from the Staples campaign website and a Robert T. Garrett Dallas Morning News article promoting the rollout. Data contained in this post was collected by searching the TEC database for donations made during the year 2012. Conservative indexes averaged to compile this report include Texas Eagle Forum, Young Conservatives of Texas and Texans for Fiscal Responsibility.

List of donors according to Todd Staples release:

Gene Powell (Powell, Gene of San Antonio)
David Zachry (Zachry, David of San Antonio)
Dan Allen Hughes (Hughes, Dan of Beeville/San Antonio)
Phil Adams (Adams, Phil of Bryan College Station)
Judy Morgan (Morgan, Judy of Texarkana)
Harold Hahn (Hahn, Harold of El Paso)
Erle Nye (Nye, Erle of Dallas)
Ardon Moore (Moore, Ardon of Fort Worth)
Johnny Baker (Baker, Johnny of Houston)
Curtis Mewbourne (Mewbourne, Curtis of Tyler)
Jim Perkins (Perkins, James of Tyler)
Margaret Perkins (Perkins, Margaret of Tyler)

Mainstream TX media shamelessly shill

$
0
0

The mainstream Texas political media, because “Turn Texas Blue” is on right now, is even more willing than usual to spend down their credibility reserves with the public at large by shilling for the Democratic Party.

Today they reported on the ObamaCare “Navigators” but chose not to mention the scandal that brought the Navigators’ credibility under widespread scrutiny in the first place; investigative reporting revealing the Navigators coaching people to defraud the federal government. They have maintained a near blackout on the story, since it would damage the Democratic Party during their latest attempt to make progress in Texas.

Today’s Navigators story was about the Texas Department of Insurance, responding to concern from Gov. Rick Perry and AG Greg Abbott, handing down rules to beef up background checks and transparency concerning the Navigators.

Burka helps Smithee

$
0
0

Paul Burka has begun talking about John Smithee as a speaker candidate. Smithee is likely to be the establishment’s repository for conservative speaker race energy next session.

Smithee scored an “F” on Empower Texans’ Fiscal Responsibility Index, and got a “D” on YCT’s ratings scorecard. He was once better than this, but has let himself be lured to where so many before him have gone, never to return – the King’s Court.

Burka is himself a court journalist, one particularly bitter against the conservative insurgency. Using his blog as a runway for a potential speaker candidate to take a nice, long turn on is a good reminder of the space Smithee occupies in Texas politics.

The more humorous part is that Burka tried, like a young man yawning to sneak his arm around a girl, to be a conservative kingmaker, or, at least, a credible judge of conservative sincerity. Burka brandished Smithee’s thin tea party credentials and quite generously tagged him as “viable”. He also damage-controlled the fact that Smithee was a Straus chair by presenting him as the Chair who didn’t vote for the House budget.

Right now is an important time in our politics. From the beginning, committed Tea Party members and fellow travelers have been provided no end of bad excuses for giving up and going along. Some are battle weary. Some thought genuineness would take them further faster than it has, and now their vanity is trying to muscle their integrity out of the decision-making process. For the establishment, this is a good time for people who can pass as conservatives to try to quietly take the reins of the conservative ship.

The big problem with that is that if conservatives are going to change anything, they need to be willing to do Austin-on-Austin violence when the situation calls for it, which is precisely what prevents you from enjoying the fruits of the Texas ruling class. Sure, they’ll let you make a show of being a good conservative, or a good liberal for that matter, especially if that is important to your re-election. That is, as long as you don’t fight when the ruling class gives the ‘sit’ command – which happens to be precisely the moments when the landscape is in danger of changing.

John Smithee may be a nice guy, and he may have a conservative bent on many issues, but a conservative fighter he is not. The truth is, for legislators and politicos there is Team Texan and Team Ruling Class. Both teams require legislators to govern. Both teams would, all things being equal, like to do good for average Texans and get along with government people in Austin. For this reason it is not uncommon for these two groups to agree on things.

The giant difference is the level of commitment to these respective priorities, and which one gets top billing. Doing right by the special interests and doing right by average Texans come into conflict early and often every session. Prioritizing the ruling class above the interests of the country on 10,000 little votes, and in 10,000 inside conversations, and in 10,000 turnings of conservative heads the other way when voters will be none the wiser is why our country is at risk.

For conservatives, a “Team Texas” priority structure is at least as important as subscribing to the right ideas, and maybe more important. This is a key political point that has yet to gain the important place it deserves in either the electorate or the political class.

Milton Friedman knew virtually every President of his adult life, and said Richard Nixon had the most comprehensive grasp of the free market economics to which he subscribed of any politician he ever met. The problem was, he subscribed to power more than his policy positions. He ended up funding Johnson’s Great Society, and he gave us the EPA, OSHA, wage and price controls, and more. Friedman said that he too quickly compromised his principles for political expediency. The temptation for it is great in politics.

Allowing yourself to be seduced by talk of how much someone likes conservative ideas is exactly how battle-weary conservatives are talked into doing something they know deep down to be wrong for Texas and against their principles. For Texas to be worthy of the leadership position that has fallen to it in the great socialism war raging throughout our government right now, conservatives must have the strength to be honest with themselves. John Henry Newman, a great 19th century English churchman, found the mark when he said, “We can believe what we choose. We are answerable for what we choose to believe.”

Consultants matter

$
0
0

Filing period is over and we have a little over a month before candidates file their first 2014 finance report. In the meantime, candidates will do their best to be fantasy candidates, which is why campaign talk is generally a thing to be ignored. Campaign finance reports will be some of the first really useful information for voters about new candidates.

Another very useful piece of information is a candidate’s consultant. In our latest consultant-measuring exercise we broke down how much on average consultants collected from GOP candidates in contested races in 2012.

ConsultantAvg CostAvg CPV
Luke Macias$11507$2.10
Kevin Brannon$20900$4.72
Allen Blakemore$28060$3.45
Jordan Berry$40776$5.15
Reb Wayne$45291$7.80
Allyn & Company$62790$15.21
Bryan Eppstein$152410$31.15
Todd Smith$171241$20
Murphy Turner Associates$215965$43.50

These numbers aren't surprising. We call Republicans who closely match the campaign and legislative versions of themselves ‘conservatives’, and we call Republicans with radically different campaign and legislative selves ‘establishment’. Our current GOP establishment uses conservative campaigning to gain power for their lobby agenda.

Unsurprisingly, conservative candidates don’t pay as much per vote and don’t pay as much for consultation. This is because telling the truth is both more trust-inspiring and easier to manage.

Politician-speak, what politicos sometimes laud as “campaign discipline”, is really just how liars sound. These tightly-managed words and talking points are a high wire act that lying politicians must learn, and some are definitely better than others.

Needless to say, it is a massive advantage for conservatives to be able to speak freely. This “undisciplined" kind of campaigning is how people telling the truth sound, and they consistently get a huge discount for it.

Conservative candidates and their consultants don't have to resort to antics to fool voters. For instance, setting up shadow PACs to closely mimic trusted and established conservative brands is an example of a tactic that can be both expensive and legally dangerous.

In the end, spending big on consultants isn't a sign that a candidate is a lock. Some of the highest paid consultants in Texas did poorly in 2012. http://www.agendawise.com/2012/08/general-consultant-analysis-pt-2/

*Data contained in this post was collected by searching the TEC database for expenditures beginning with filing in 2011 running till the first TEC financial filing after the GOP primary in 2012. Direct expenditures to consultants were

GOP establishment vs conservatives

$
0
0

Representative Jim Keffer recently warned ERCOT about Republican primary candidates who don’t open the taxpayer’s checkbook at every magical mention of the word “infrastructure”.

It was political hackery at its most basic – a chocolate-nosed suit serving as herald to the powerful. He was not warning them against people who oppose infrastructure, he was warning them against people who actually require convincing when potential recipients of such spending claim massive infrastructure projects are needed. He's warning against people who also require such undertakings be done responsibly and efficiently.

Conservative opposition to infrastructure projects is wholly on grounds such as these, but political hacks reflexively lie in their attempts to tag them “anti-infrastructure”. In reality, these conservatives consider governmental integrity to be fundamental infrastructure, a concept difficult to comprehend for power barnacles such as Keffer.

Keffer said, “Your companies, your PACs, however you do your contributions in this upcoming campaign season, be involved, be involved in the primary… Make sure their vision is the same as your vision for the State of Texas before you give them one single dime. Make sure they are understanding that you have a vested interest in this future and you still want to see Texas still be No. 1.”

Keffer’s ‘vision’, it seems, is of a lobbyocracy  , where the size of campaign contributions determine the righteousness of causes, and the lines of power generate a corrupt political common sense politicos collectively pretend is organic.

By contrast, the vision held by the patriots Keffer rides as Paul Revere against are pro-business, but anti-corruption, even when it comes from the big businesses that are heavily entangled in government. These conservatives desire Texas be number one in more than business. They prioritize rule of law, common sense, integrity, and genuine freedom just as highly.

Regarding the people at the ERCOT meeting, the conservatives Keffer opposes earnestly appeal, right alongside the businessperson in them, to the patriot in them. Meanwhile, ruling class hack legislators appeal to them with the naked power, that familiar political chord that will end the American experiment in failure if not suppressed.

Live Stream Wallace Hall Impeachment Hearing

Abbott takes first step against tax-funded lobbying

$
0
0

Gubernatorial candidate Attorney General Greg Abbott has come out against tax-funded lobbying in the case of school districts, their boards, or their associations. This is an excellent step in the right direction. Tax-funded lobbying is a moral hazard in which government uses tax money to lobby government for more government, and it should be completely illegal. Some of the worst offenders are municipalities and counties. School boards are a good start, but the entire practice needs to go the way of the dodo bird very soon.

--Abbott campaign opposition to tax-funded lobbying by school districts


Conservative Budget Coalition Press Conference

The next UT Chancellor

$
0
0
Paul Burka referred to Chairman and President of the Dallas Federal Reserve, Richard Fischer and Admiral William McRaven, current Youtube sensation and one of the ruling class’s hottest new commodities, as...

Carona against Hall impeachment

$
0
0
Departing State Senator John Carona, via mass email yesterday, said he did not support the impeachment of Regent Wallace Hall and would have voted against it had he been on the committee.   Carona was responding to a Jon Cassidy article about the events surrounding Bill Powers’...

Grassroots America Press Conference

Vargas, Univision, and ruling class credibility

$
0
0
Journalist Jose Antonio Vargas, who was made into a sympathetic symbol of illegal immigration by the left several years ago, was arrested in McAllen, Texas on Tuesday. His place in the world of journalism illustrates how the ruling class media defines bona fide journalism on the basis of...

Texas Racing Commission Rule Hearing

LBB swings right in Senate, left in House

$
0
0
Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst and Speaker Joe Straus made the new appointments to the Legislative Budget Board this week. Dewhurst shifted his appointments to the right in the Senate while Straus negated the Senate shift by swinging the House approximately the same distance to the left....

Hailey and Jones make case for Turner

$
0
0
Austin Insider blogger Mike Hailey and Rice political science professor Mark Jones recently teamed up to make a good argument for a new speaker.   Hailey pointed out that Republican House Reps who support Speaker Straus are being systematically replaced. Jones pointed out why....

Fiscal Index emails are lobbying?

$
0
0
The Texas Ethics Commission largely covered their outside counsel legal bills today with a $10,000 fine on Michael Quinn Sullivan for failing to register as a lobbyist. The fine and the state’s outside counsel bills are roughly the same.   In recent months the TEC hired the...

2015 UT Regent appointments

$
0
0
In 2015 there will be three UT Board of Regents appointments made by the Governor and approved by the Senate.   With the cost of higher education growing there have been calls for greater transparency and accountability at all of Texas’ public institutions, but especially its...

Patrick snug as a bug on committee chairs

$
0
0
The establishment GOP is shuttering at the prospect of a conviction conservative sitting in the Lt. Governor chair.   This is happening just after Battleground Texas and Wendy Davis have cycled through strategies for “turning Texas blue” before giving up. The Texas ruling class...

Lubbock GOP considers hiring lawyer

$
0
0
The Lubbock County GOP is in the process of hiring lawyer Eric Opiela in the event there is an opening in House District 83, according to Chairman Carl Tepper.   Opiela has been in the news of late for his botched role in the redistricting process. Currently a federal court in San...
Viewing all 272 articles
Browse latest View live